What's on your mind?

[DerVVulfman]

I think you mispelled "Trump".
Hillary isn't nationalist, traditionalist, or militaristic enough to be a fascist. She also isn't populist, though she tries.
No, the fascist here is Trump, I'm sure of it. Hillary is just your typical politician.
Also, not every straight arm raise at an angle is a nazi salute, otherwise Laura Ingram also did it at the RNC, for like 3 seconds.

This is a definition of Fascism I adhere to:
http://interglacial.com/pub/text/Umberto...scism.html

But of course you have your right wing bias and I have my left wing bias (though it doesn't blind me to my own side's flaws like yours does).

Ah, I misspelled the name 'Hilarity', because she is instead a joke.

And I do not appreciate the way you already issued an attack with the phrase (though it doesn't blind me to my own side's flaws like yours does).  That's one.  Do not let there be a second.  You do have a tendency to actively make things personal.

Ah, Umberto Eno, the author of The Name of the Rose.  I still have my old paperback of the novel somewhere on my bookshelf.  Hehe.. I now have it in my HANDS.  The tale of William de Baskerville, a Franciscan monk in 1327 who became detective after seven grissly deaths.

Now insofar as his points on Facism from his 1995 discussion, most (if not all) can be attributed to the Liberal party as shown below:

Content Hidden

Under part 1, the cult of tradition, the 'combination of different forms of belief or practice' as he so puts it means to be politically correct.  Oh, the whole Democratic Party is so PC that they cannot even define the threat of Isis properly

Under part 2, he discussed the role of modernization.  How often has the administration pushed new technology so far as to endanger our economy?  The wind generators have killed more American Eagles than the coal industry.  And speaking of which, Coal was 33% of our energy supply.

Under part 3, he discusses distrust of the intellectual world.  However, I question the teachings and merits of our own colleges when I saw videos of students willing to sign away their own First Amendment rights in Harvard.  Can one actually say that the students are being taught properly when they do not know they are signing away their rights to free speech and the right to petition?

I need not discuss part 4, but part 5  discusses the exploiting and exacerbating the natural fear of difference . Only just recently, Hillary Clinton talked about the outrage of Ferguson.  Let it be known that even the Attorney General, Eric Holder, said that the late Michael ***** did not raise his hands in surrender to the police officer as those preaching "Hands Up Don't Shoot" still shout today.  He stated that the forensic evidence wholly contradicted the story of the eyewitnesses, two who later stated they never saw the incident while the other two were his friends.  And it was Democrat mayor de Blasio or NY who turned on his own police force.  Until then, there was Mayor Giuliani who lowered crime rate by working with the police.

Part 6 is about social inequality.  Who better to discuss economic inequality than a woman who has the richest FOUNDATION in the U.S.A., goes to meetings about inequality with $50,000 pantsuits and refuses to reveal the transcripts of her Wallstreet speeches.  No.  That's just stupidity there.  And let's not forget her hubby signed the Communities Morgage act that forced banks to give morgages to people who couldn't afford them and caused our housing crisis, or that she WAS involved in NAFTA.

In part 7, he talks about having the nation feel besieged by a threat.  I am not sure you've read anything recently, but right now our biggest threat does seem to stem from ISIS who is spreading worldwide?  There's not much to say other than that the democratic party's reaction is to stick their heads in the sand like an ostrich.  Border security?  There's been a senate report that confirms that Mexican cartels have been involved in human trafficking.  And in fact, they caught the cartels smuggling a Kuwaiti ISIS operative named Shaykh Mahmood Omar Khabir crossing the border into the U.S.

In part 8, he talks about attacking the "ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies."  Ahah!  The democrats continuous volleys against Wallstreet and the so named 1%ers.  Oddly, that would include Hillary Clinton.  But hey, she's a Nazi too, so she can attack Wallstreet while taking their payoffs.

In part 9, he talks about continuous war.  I'll let this picture sink in.  And for the record, even CNN won't dispute it.  He's killed just as many civilians as combatants.



In part 10, he says Fascism can "only advocate a popular elitism. Every citizen belongs to the best people in the world, the members or the party are the best among the citizens,"  Yet the eMails of Lois Lerner of the IRS targeted those opposing Obama in the 2012 election showed her disdain for the Tea Party with unmitigated hate.  And the current batch of Wikileaked eMails are a sight to behold.  Not that I didn't love how Harry Reid 100% lied about Romney's tax record to the press in an office where he was fully covered from legal retribution.  The liberal elites are the facists here.  Anyone else is utter waste in their eyes.

In part 11, um... wow.   Last I heard, that was the Kamikazis... or the suicide bombers getting their 87 virgins after a glorious and heroic death.

In part 12, he tries to play with the idea that facist heroes 'play with weapons' in his own words.  Here, there is room for disagreement.  Comically, people in comic lore would characterize Batman as a nazi, a vigilante who actually disdains guns since his parents were killed by a gunman.  At the same time, every army on Earth carries weapons and no one calls them nazis.  This is a point that has way too much room to be counted.

In part 13, he points out that under fascist rule  " individuals have no rights, and the People is conceived as a quality, a monolithic entity expressing the Common Will"  Kinda sounds like socialism to me.  And that is what the Democratic party seems to be going for.  A world socialist order thanks to supporters abroad like George Soros

In part 14, he touches upon Newspeak .  Oh, dayum... got ya there.  Again back to the current teachings in our colleges.  What are they learning if they don't even recognize their rights, their rights to free speech?  And the Common Core standard created in 2008?  It's a disaster.  Seriously, students are required a high-end calculator in class to do their math.  Not all of them can do math in their head now!

So your definition of fascism can easily be used to identify the liberal party just the same, if not moreso.

And do not again direct insults at anyone in your post, either directly or indirectly.