05-19-2018, 03:32 AM 
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2018, 03:36 AM by DerVVulfman.)
	
	
	
		No problem.  Given the similarities between the two, you could jump from Ruby to C++ after some practice.
Oh, and I should point out that default initialize methods do exist within C++ programming as well, likely what Ruby's default initialize is based upon. The creation of automatic, static, or thread-local variables is thus made possible without such a method being added into the code, sloppy though that may be. Oh, I've done some studying of constructors and destructors in C++. Destructors are akin to the 'dispose' method we make, and there are default dispose and destructor methods.
	
	
	
	
Oh, and I should point out that default initialize methods do exist within C++ programming as well, likely what Ruby's default initialize is based upon. The creation of automatic, static, or thread-local variables is thus made possible without such a method being added into the code, sloppy though that may be. Oh, I've done some studying of constructors and destructors in C++. Destructors are akin to the 'dispose' method we make, and there are default dispose and destructor methods.

 
 
 What's up, RMers?
 What's up, RMers?
 
 
![[Image: QrnbKlx.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/QrnbKlx.jpg)
![[Image: sGz1ErF.png]](https://i.imgur.com/sGz1ErF.png)
![[Image: liM4ikn.png]](https://i.imgur.com/liM4ikn.png)
![[Image: fdzKgZA.png]](https://i.imgur.com/fdzKgZA.png)
![[Image: sj0H81z.png]](https://i.imgur.com/sj0H81z.png)
![[Image: QL7oRau.png]](https://i.imgur.com/QL7oRau.png)
![[Image: uSqjY09.png]](https://i.imgur.com/uSqjY09.png)
![[Image: GAA3qE9.png]](https://i.imgur.com/GAA3qE9.png)
![[Image: 2Hmnx1G.png]](https://i.imgur.com/2Hmnx1G.png)
![[Image: BwtNdKw.png%5B]](https://i.imgur.com/BwtNdKw.png%5B)