Posts: 627
Threads: 38
Joined: May 2009
So... does that mean it will never work? What will I have to mess with to make it compatible? Just the screen_x, screen_y and setup? I noticed in atoa's there's a base_x and base_y as well as screen_x and screen_y. Then there's target_x and y and actual_x and y.
Nope, no aspirin can save me now.
My partner in crime = TREXRELL
Posts: 11,193
Threads: 649
Joined: May 2009
I will look into it more, but the screen_x and screen_y values in his system are just being used. He didn't redefine them by creating a def screen_x method (and the like). It must be something else.
Posts: 627
Threads: 38
Joined: May 2009
Hmm, I will continue messing around with it too. So if he never redefines them, then does that mean he's using something else? Maybe that base_x and y. It seems complicated.
My partner in crime = TREXRELL
Posts: 11,193
Threads: 649
Joined: May 2009
Well, screen_x and screen_y are standards that are used to position the battlers in every 'strategic' system that I know.
Posts: 627
Threads: 38
Joined: May 2009
Well, I'm still messing around with it. Everything is failing.
Hopefully with the next update, it will work.
My partner in crime = TREXRELL
Posts: 11,193
Threads: 649
Joined: May 2009
Finally generated the overlapping error. Ugh. Looking into WHAT THE HELL to do to fix that.
Seriously.....
Posts: 627
Threads: 38
Joined: May 2009
Really? I think it has something to do with the indices because it only happens when there's more than one of the same kind of enemy. Also, I was switching around the screen_x stuff a bit, I changed them to base x and base_y and it kind of works sometimes, but then it gives me that dmg mirror error even MORE.
My partner in crime = TREXRELL
Posts: 11,193
Threads: 649
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 627
Threads: 38
Joined: May 2009
Like the monkey on family guy.
My partner in crime = TREXRELL
Posts: 11,193
Threads: 649
Joined: May 2009
The sad part, was he wasn't 'always' evil.