VX versus XP. Your view upon the two engines.
01-02-2010, 06:16 AM
Here's my bit of experience with the two makers.
When I first got XP, I loved it. I loved playing around with the mapping and stuff like that. It was fun making detailed (yet kinda small) maps.
Then I got VX. I started messing around with VX, getting used to the fact that it has that little event generator (the one that makes doors, chests and warps) and the mapping. Oh boy the mapping. The mapping in VX made it painful for me to go back to XP. I was looking at the layers and stuff like "WTF is this?"
But now, I'm getting used to XP again because it's the maker my friend uses and we are working on a game together and she doesn't want to get VX because of how the tiles look.
But in general, I like both makers a whole lot.
When I first got XP, I loved it. I loved playing around with the mapping and stuff like that. It was fun making detailed (yet kinda small) maps.
Then I got VX. I started messing around with VX, getting used to the fact that it has that little event generator (the one that makes doors, chests and warps) and the mapping. Oh boy the mapping. The mapping in VX made it painful for me to go back to XP. I was looking at the layers and stuff like "WTF is this?"
But now, I'm getting used to XP again because it's the maker my friend uses and we are working on a game together and she doesn't want to get VX because of how the tiles look.
But in general, I like both makers a whole lot.